Manufacturing & Industrial Capital

    Structured working capital for raw material procurement, production scaling, equipment investment, and receivable management across active production cycles.

    ELIGIBLE OPERATORS

    • •Contract manufacturers & OEM suppliers
    • •Metal fabrication & machining shops
    • •Food & beverage production
    • •Packaging & assembly operations
    • •Chemical & specialty manufacturers
    • •Industrial component producers

    CAPITAL USED FOR

    • •Raw material procurement
    • •Production line staffing
    • •Equipment purchases & upgrades
    • •Facility expansion
    • •Receivable gaps on net-30 to net-90 terms
    • •Supply chain prepayment obligations

    Estimate Your Capital Need

    Capital Needs Assessment. Manufacturing

    Enter your operating profile to estimate your working capital gap and recommended facility structure.

    Estimated Capital Profile

    Buyer payment gap

    $1,800,000

    60-day payment cycle

    Procurement float

    $210,000

    21-day production cycle

    Estimated capital gap

    $1,290,000

    Identified capital need

    This figure reflects your buyer payment gap and procurement float across your production cycle. Most manufacturers structure capital around one production run at a time. A typical first facility ranges from $200K to $600K depending on your materials schedule and buyer terms. Enter your contact information below to see how this would be structured for your operation.

    Request a Capital Review. A capital advisor will review your assessment and follow up to discuss structure options.

    Estimates are for advisory reference only. All structures subject to full financial review.

    Built for Active Production Operations

    We work with established manufacturers managing production schedules, supply chain obligations, and institutional buyer payment terms.

    • Contract manufacturers and OEM suppliers
    • Metal fabrication and machining shops
    • Food and beverage production facilities
    • Packaging and assembly operations
    • Chemical and specialty product manufacturers
    • Industrial component producers scaling output

    Most clients generate $300K to $3M+ in monthly revenue with recurring purchase orders from institutional buyers.

    Typical Working Ranges

    $200K to $500K

    Material procurement and operating liquidity

    $500K to $1M

    Production scaling and multi-line growth

    $1M to $3M+

    Facility expansion and large-order fulfillment

    All structures are tailored to production cycles and buyer payment terms.

    Where Capital Is Deployed

    • Raw material and inventory procurement
    • Production line staffing and labor costs
    • Equipment purchases and machinery upgrades
    • Facility expansion and warehouse buildout
    • Receivable gap coverage on net-30 to net-90 terms
    • Supply chain prepayment obligations
    • Quality certification and compliance investments

    Structured Review Process

    1. 1.Initial discussion around production volume, buyer contracts, and revenue flow
    2. 2.Review of recent business performance and receivable aging
    3. 3.Capital structure options presented
    4. 4.Ongoing relationship as production operations scale

    A Capital Advisory Approach

    We work directly with private capital sources who understand manufacturing. Funding is built around production cycles, raw material procurement, and buyer payment terms. Not off-the-shelf lending products.

    • Familiar with manufacturing supply chain and PO cycles
    • Experience supporting multi-facility industrial operators
    • Discreet and direct communication
    • Long-term capital access as production scales

    Representative Structures

    Selected engagements from recent capital structuring work. Identifying details have been generalized for confidentiality.

    Situation

    Precision metal fabrication, Midwest region. A $28M contract manufacturer awarded a $4.2M purchase order from an aerospace tier-one supplier requiring raw material procurement and labor commitment 120 days ahead of first delivery and invoice settlement.

    Structure Deployed

    Structured a $1.4M PO-backed facility sized to the materials and labor runway through first delivery milestone. Existing bank line was retained for ongoing operations. Facility was tied to the specific contract rather than blanket receivables.

    Outcome

    Funded in 12 business days. Production commenced on the contracted timeline. Facility retired in full upon receipt of the second delivery payment, with the operator positioned for follow-on PO awards.

    Situation

    Plastics and injection molding, Southeast region. A $16M operator carrying $2.6M in net-60 receivables across regional consumer goods customers, with a working capital gap created by a primary supplier requiring shortened payment terms following a resin price increase.

    Structure Deployed

    Structured a $750K receivables-backed facility against verified customer receivables, advancing 80 percent on approved invoices. Coordination with the supplier preserved the existing trade relationship while the facility absorbed the timing mismatch.

    Outcome

    Closed in 10 business days. Production maintained without interruption. Facility utilization normalized to roughly 40 percent of capacity within six months as customer payment cycles adjusted.

    Situation

    Industrial equipment manufacturer, Mid-Atlantic region. A $34M operator pursuing a $2.3M CNC and automation upgrade to support a multi-year supply agreement with a domestic energy sector customer.

    Structure Deployed

    Recommended against the short-term capital structure the operator initially evaluated. The financial profile supported conventional equipment financing at materially better terms. Coordinated the facility through an institutional lending partner aligned with industrial equipment underwriting.

    Outcome

    Closed a $2.5M conventional equipment facility within 26 days. New automation deployed and operational within 90 days. Cost of capital approximately 50 percent below the bridge alternative initially considered.